Assignment Focused SOAP Note for Schizophrenia Spectrum, Other Psychotic, and Medication-Induced Movement Disorders
Case Study: Sherman Tremaine
Psychotic disorders change one’s sense of reality and cause abnormal thinking and perception. Patients presenting with psychotic disorders may suffer from delusions or hallucinations or may display negative symptoms such as lack of emotion or withdraw from social situations or relationships. Symptoms of medication-induced movement disorders can be mild or lethal and can include, for example, tremors, dystonic reactions, or serotonin syndrome.
For this Assignment, you will complete a focused SOAP note for a patient in a case study who has either a schizophrenia spectrum, other psychotic, or medication-induced movement disorder.
To Prepare
- Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider the insights they provide about assessing, diagnosing, and treating schizophrenia spectrum, other psychotic, and medication-induced movement disorders.
- Review the Focused SOAP Note template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. There is also a Focused SOAP Note Exemplar provided as a guide for Assignment expectations.
- Review the video, Case Study: Sherman Tremaine. You will use this case as the basis of this Assignment. In this video, a Walden faculty member is assessing a mock patient. The patient will be represented onscreen as an avatar.
- Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.
- Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.
The Assignment
Develop a focused SOAP note, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:
- Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
- Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
- Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, and list them in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
- Plan: What is your plan for psychotherapy? What is your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters, as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. Also incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.
- Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session again? Discuss what your next intervention would be if you were able to follow up with this patient. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion, and disease prevention, taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
- Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old).
Expert Answer and Explanation
Subjective:
CC (chief complaint): “My sister asked me to come here.”
HPI: ST is a 53-year-old African American male who was asked to come for mental health assessment by his sister. The patient reports seeing people watching and spying on him from his window. He also hears people talking to him when he switches on his TV. ST says that the people talking to him and watching him as spies sent by the government to arrest him the moment, he calls the police.
The says that the alleged spies are working with his sister to arrest him. His delusions and hallucinations have affected his social and professional life. He rates the delusions and hallucinations on a scale of 9/10.
Substance Current Use: He says that he smokes all day. His sister brings him 12 packets of cigarettes a week. He also drinks alcohol weekly. He smoked marijuana last three years ago. No history of drug use.
Medical History: Well-managed diabetes and fatty liver.
- Current Medications: History of Haldol and Thorazine and notes that he rated them. He stopped taking Risperdal because they enlarge his breasts.
- Allergies: No allergies
- Reproductive Hx: No reproductive issues.
ROS:
- GENERAL: No weight change, appetite change, weakness, fatigue, or chills.
- HEENT: Noncontributory.
- SKIN: No rash or itching.
- CARDIOVASCULAR: No palpations, edema, chest pain, or pressure.
- RESPIRATORY: No sputum or shortness of breath.
- GASTROINTESTINAL: No nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting, or diarrhea.
- GENITOURINARY: No UTI, urinary urgency, or odor.
- NEUROLOGICAL: No ataxia, dizziness, or headaches.
- MUSCULOSKELETAL: No joint or muscle stiffness or pain.
- HEMATOLOGIC: No anemia, HIV, or bruising.
- LYMPHATICS: No enlarged nodes.
- ENDOCRINOLOGIC: No sweat or cold problems.
Objective:
- Vital signs: 5’9, Wt. 159lbs, HR 80, BP 130/95, T 35.7, RR 20.
- Cardiovascular:Clear chest walls, no lifts, hives, or thrills. No heart murmurs. No gallops. Regular heart rhythm and rate.
- Heart/Peripheral Vascular: Normal RR. Lungs clear without fluids.
Diagnostic results:
- Brief Clinical Assessment Scale for Schizophrenia (BCASS): BCASS is often used to screen for schizophrenia (Yildiz et al., 2021). Yildiz et al. (2021) reported that BSCASS is a reliable and valid tool for screening for schizophrenia in people with symptoms of delusions and hallucinations. The tool takes about 30 minutes to complete.
Assessment:
Mental Status Examination: The patient looks at his stated age. He is well-groomed and kempt. He is oriented to place, time, and people. His speech is normal and his mood is consistent with affect. However, he does not maintain eye contact. He answers questions properly. He reports delusions and hallucinations. No suicidal or homicidal thoughts. Memory and concentration are intact. Judgment and insight are also intact.
Diagnostic Impression:
- Schizophrenia DSM-5 295.90 (F20. 9)
- Schizoaffective Disorder DSM-5 295.70 (F25.0)
- Delusion Disorder DSM-5 297.1 (F22)
The primary diagnosis is schizophrenia. According to McCutcheon et al. (2020), schizophrenia is a mental health condition that causes delusions and hallucinations. The symptoms of schizophrenia include negative symptoms, delusions, hallucinations, catatonic behavior, and disorganized speech (American Psychiatric Association (APA), 2013).
DSM-5 highlights that at least two symptoms should be noted for one to be diagnosed with schizophrenia (APA, 2013). One of the symptoms should either be hallucinations or delusions. The patient has both hallucinations and delusions making the disorder a primary diagnosis. The second diagnosis is schizoaffective disorder.
A patient with schizoaffective disorder causes schizophrenia symptoms and depressed mood (Peterson et al., 2019). According to DSM-5, patients should be diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder if they have depressed mood and schizophrenia symptoms (APA, 2013). The disorder was included in the diagnosis because the patient has delusions and hallucinations.
However, the patient does not have a depressed mood, and thus the disorder has been ruled out. The last disorder is delusion disorder. Delusion disorder is associated with delusional ideas (Joseph & Siddiqui, 2021). The disorder has been ruled out because the delusions the patient experience are a result of schizophrenia.
Reflections:
I agree with the preceptor’s diagnosis. The patient has schizophrenia. If I was given a chance, I would have screened the patient for depression. The ethical consideration, in this case, is the safety of the medication. The patient has the right to safe medication. The patient also has a right to be treated justly without any discrimination. I would avoid being judgmental when treating the patient. I would educate the patient to avoid alcohol and cigarette since they can negatively affect his health.
Case Formulation and Treatment Plan:
The presented symptoms show that the patient has schizophrenia. However, he should be referred to a psychiatrist for extensive mental health assessment and treatment. The patient can be recommended quetiapine fumarate extended-release (XR) 300 mg/day PO (Li et al., 2018). The dosage should be maintained between 400-800 mg/day.
Quetiapine has been selected because it is effective in treating schizophrenia, is well-tolerated and has good completion rates (Li et al., 2018). Li et al. (2018) noted that quetiapine is safe and has high efficacy in treating schizophrenia. Quetiapine XR tablets have been recommended because they allow a physician to start treatment at a high dose quickly to reach a therapeutic level.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Joseph, S. M., & Siddiqui, W. (2021). Delusional disorder. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.
Li, H., Shen, Y., Wang, G., Shi, J., Ma, C., Xie, S., & Gu, N. (2018). A 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, chlorpromazine-controlled non-inferiorityrandomized phase iiitrial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of quetiapine fumarate (SEROQUEL) extended-release (XR) in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia and acute episodes. Psychiatry Research, 259, 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.07.006
McCutcheon, R. A., Marques, T. R., & Howes, O. D. (2020). Schizophrenia—an overview. JAMA Psychiatry, 77(2), 201-210. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3360
Peterson, D. L., Webb, C. A., Keeley, J. W., Gaebel, W., Zielasek, J., Rebello, T. J., & Reed, G. M. (2019). The reliability and clinical utility of ICD-11 schizoaffective disorder: A field trial. Schizophrenia Research, 208, 235-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.02.011
Yildiz, M., Incedere, A., Gürcan, M. B., & Osman, E. (2021). Brief Clinical Assessment Scale for Schizophrenia (BCASS): Development, validity, and reliability study. Noro Psikiyatri Arsivi, 59(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.27592
Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers.Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order
FAQs
- schizoaffective disorder soap note
- pmhnp soap note example
- progress note for schizophrenia
- sample psychiatric review of systems
By Day 7 of Week 5
Submit your Focused SOAP Note.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 5 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 5 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
NRNP/PRAC 6665 & 6675 Comprehensive Focused SOAP Psychiatric Evaluation Template
Subjective:
CC (chief complaint):
HPI:
Substance Current Use:
Medical History:
- Current Medications:
- Allergies:
- Reproductive Hx:
ROS:
- GENERAL:
- HEENT:
- SKIN:
- CARDIOVASCULAR:
- RESPIRATORY:
- GASTROINTESTINAL:
- GENITOURINARY:
- NEUROLOGICAL:
- MUSCULOSKELETAL:
- HEMATOLOGIC:
- LYMPHATICS:
- ENDOCRINOLOGIC:
Objective:
Diagnostic results:
Assessment:
Mental Status Examination:
Diagnostic Impression:
Reflections:
Case Formulation and Treatment Plan:
References
Focused SOAP Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar
INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE EXEMPLAR AND TEMPLATE—READ CAREFULLY
If you are struggling with the format or remembering what to include, follow the Focused SOAP Note Evaluation Template AND the Rubric as your guide. It is also helpful to review the rubric in detail in order not to lose points unnecessarily because you missed something required. After reviewing full details of the rubric, you can use it as a guide.
In the Subjective section, provide:
- Chief complaint
- History of present illness (HPI)
- Past psychiatric history
- Medication trials and current medications
- Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis
- Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history
- Allergies
- ROS
Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!
In the Objective section, provide:
- Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history
- Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses.
Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!
In the Assessment section, provide:
- Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form.
- At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
- Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!
Reflect on this case. Include: Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), social determinates of health, health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
(The FOCUSED SOAP psychiatric evaluation is typically the follow-up visit patient note. You will practice writing this type of note in this course. You will be focusing more on the symptoms from your differential diagnosis from the comprehensive psychiatric evaluation narrowing to your diagnostic impression. You will write up what symptoms are present and what symptoms are not present from illnesses to demonstrate you have indeed assessed for illnesses which could be impacting your patient. For example, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, bipolar symptoms, psychosis symptoms, substance use, etc.)
EXEMPLAR BEGINS HERE
Subjective:
CC (chief complaint): A brief statement identifying why the patient is here. This statement is verbatim of the patient’s own words about why presenting for assessment. For a patient with dementia or other cognitive deficits, this statement can be obtained from a family member.
HPI: Begin this section with patient’s initials, age, race, gender, purpose of evaluation, current medication and referral reason. For example:
N.M. is a 34-year-old Asian male presents for medication management follow up for anxiety. He was initiated sertraline last appt which he finds was effective for two weeks then symptoms began to return.
Or
P.H., a 16-year-old Hispanic female, presents for follow up to discuss previous psychiatric evaluation for concentration difficulty. She is not currently prescribed psychotropic medications as we deferred until further testing and screening was conducted.
Then, this section continues with the symptom analysis for your note. Thorough documentation in this section is essential for patient care, coding, and billing analysis.
Paint a picture of what is wrong with the patient. First what is bringing the patient to your follow up evaluation? Document symptom onset, duration, frequency, severity, and impact. What has worsened or improved since last appointment? What stressors are they facing? Your description here will guide your differential diagnoses into your diagnostic impression. You are seeking symptoms that may align with many DSM-5 diagnoses, narrowing to what aligns with diagnostic criteria for mental health and substance use disorders.
Substance Use History: This section contains any history or current use of caffeine, nicotine, illicit substance (including marijuana), and alcohol. Include the daily amount of use and last known use. Include type of use such as inhales, snorts, IV, etc. Include any histories of withdrawal complications from tremors, Delirium Tremens, or seizures.
Current Medications: Include dosage, frequency, length of time used, and reason for use. Also include OTC or homeopathic products.
Allergies: Include medication, food, and environmental allergies separately. Provide a description of what the allergy is (e.g., angioedema, anaphylaxis). This will help determine a true reaction vs. intolerance.
Reproductive Hx: Menstrual history (date of LMP), Pregnant (yes or no), Nursing/lactating (yes or no), contraceptive use (method used), types of intercourse: oral, anal, vaginal, other, any sexual concerns
ROS: Cover all body systems that may help you include or rule out a differential diagnosis. Please note: THIS IS DIFFERENT from a physical examination!
You should list each system as follows: General: Head: EENT: etc. You should list these in bullet format and document the systems in order from head to toe.
Example of Complete ROS:
GENERAL: No weight loss, fever, chills, weakness, or fatigue.
HEENT: Eyes: No visual loss, blurred vision, double vision, or yellow sclerae. Ears, Nose, Throat: No hearing loss, sneezing, congestion, runny nose, or sore throat.
SKIN: No rash or itching.
CARDIOVASCULAR: No chest pain, chest pressure, or chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema.
RESPIRATORY: No shortness of breath, cough, or sputum.
GASTROINTESTINAL: No anorexia, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. No abdominal pain or blood.
GENITOURINARY: Burning on urination, urgency, hesitancy, odor, odd color
NEUROLOGICAL: No headache, dizziness, syncope, paralysis, ataxia, numbness, or tingling in the extremities. No change in bowel or bladder control.
MUSCULOSKELETAL: No muscle, back pain, joint pain, or stiffness.
HEMATOLOGIC: No anemia, bleeding, or bruising.
LYMPHATICS: No enlarged nodes. No history of splenectomy.
ENDOCRINOLOGIC: No reports of sweating, cold, or heat intolerance. No polyuria or polydipsia.
Objective:
Diagnostic results: Include any labs, X-rays, or other diagnostics that are needed to develop the differential diagnoses (support with evidenced and guidelines).
Assessment:
Mental Status Examination: For the purposes of your courses, this section must be presented in paragraph form and not use of a checklist! This section you will describe the patient’s appearance, attitude, behavior, mood and affect, speech, thought processes, thought content, perceptions (hallucinations, pseudohallucinations, illusions, etc.)., cognition, insight, judgment, and SI/HI.
See an example below. You will modify to include the specifics for your patient on the above elements—DO NOT just copy the example. You may use a preceptor’s way of organizing the information if the MSE is in paragraph form.
He is an 8-year-old African American male who looks his stated age. He is cooperative with examiner. He is neatly groomed and clean, dressed appropriately. There is no evidence of any abnormal motor activity. His speech is clear, coherent, normal in volume and tone. His thought process is goal directed and logical. There is no evidence of looseness of association or flight of ideas.
His mood is euthymic, and his affect appropriate to his mood. He was smiling at times in an appropriate manner. He denies any auditory or visual hallucinations. There is no evidence of any delusional thinking. He denies any current suicidal or homicidal ideation. Cognitively, he is alert and oriented. His recent and remote memory is intact. His concentration is good. His insight is good.
Diagnostic Impression: You must begin to narrow your differential diagnosis to your diagnostic impression. You must explain how and why (your rationale) you ruled out any of your differential diagnoses. You must explain how and why (your rationale) you concluded to your diagnostic impression. You will use supporting evidence from the literature to support your rationale. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
Also included in this section is the reflection. Reflect on this case and discuss whether or not you agree with your preceptor’s assessment and diagnostic impression of the patient and why or why not. What did you learn from this case? What would you do differently?
Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrating critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), social determinates of health, health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
Case Formulation and Treatment Plan
Includes documentation of diagnostic studies that will be obtained, referrals to other health care providers, therapeutic interventions including psychotherapy and/or psychopharmacology, education, disposition of the patient, and any planned follow-up visits. Each diagnosis or condition documented in the assessment should be addressed in the plan. The details of the plan should follow an orderly manner. *See an example below. You will modify to your practice so there may be information excluded/included. If you are completing this for a practicum, what does your preceptor document?
Risks and benefits of medications are discussed including non- treatment. Potential side effects of medications discussed (be detailed in what side effects discussed). Informed client not to stop medication abruptly without discussing with providers. Instructed to call and report any adverse reactions. Discussed risk of medication with pregnancy/fetus, encouraged birth control, discussed if does become pregnant to inform provider as soon as possible. Discussed how some medications might decreased birth control pill, would need back up method (exclude for males).
Discussed risks of mixing medications with OTC drugs, herbal, alcohol/illegal drugs. Instructed to avoid this practice. Encouraged abstinence. Discussed how drugs/alcohol affect mental health, physical health, sleep architecture.
Initiation of (list out any medication and why prescribed, any therapy services or referrals to specialist):
Client was encouraged to continue with case management and/or therapy services (if not provided by you)
Client has emergency numbers: Emergency Services 911, the Client’s Crisis Line 1-800-_______. Client instructed to go to nearest ER or call 911 if they become actively suicidal and/or homicidal. (only if you or preceptor provided them)
Reviewed hospital records/therapist records for collaborative information; Reviewed PMP report (only if actually completed)
Time allowed for questions and answers provided. Provided supportive listening. Client appeared to understand discussion. Client is amenable with this plan and agrees to follow treatment regimen as discussed. (this relates to informed consent; you will need to assess their understanding and agreement)
Follow up with PCP as needed and/or for:
Labs ordered and/or reviewed (write out what diagnostic test ordered, rationale for ordering, and if discussed fasting/non fasting or other patient education)
Return to clinic:
Continued treatment is medically necessary to address chronic symptoms, improve functioning, and prevent the need for a higher level of care.
References (move to begin on next page)
You are required to include at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines which relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Be sure to use correct APA 7th edition formatting.