Evidence-based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
Evidence-based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?
When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.
Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.
Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?
In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.
To Prepare:
- Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
- Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
- Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
- Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:
- The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
- A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
- A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
- A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
- A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Required Sources
- Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
- Chapter 2, “Asking Compelling Clinical Questions” (pp. 33–54)
- Chapter 21, “Generating Evidence Through Quantitative and Qualitative Research” (pp. 607–653)
- Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal Links to an external site., 26, 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.
00848.x - Hoare, Z., & Hoe, J. (2013). Understanding quantitative research: Part 2. Nursing Standard Links to an external site., 27(18), 48–55. doi:10.7748/ns2013.01.27.18.
48.c9488 - Hoe, J., & Hoare, Z. (2012). Understanding quantitative research: Part 1. Nursing Standard Links to an external site., 27(15), 52–57. doi:10.7748/ns2012.12.27.15.
52.c9485 - Walden University Library. (n.d.-a). Databases A-Z: Nursing Links to an external site.. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicguides.
waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981 - Walden University Library. (n.d.-b). Evaluating resources: Primary & secondary sources Links to an external site.. Links to an external site.Retrieved January 22, 2020, from https://academicguides.
waldenu.edu/library/ evaluating/sources - Walden University Library. (n.d.-f). Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Boolean terms. Links to an external site.Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://academicguides.
waldenu.edu/library/keyword/ boolean - Walden University Library. (n.d.-g).Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Introduction to keyword searching Links to an external site.. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://academicguides.
waldenu.edu/library/keyword/ searching-basics - Walden University Library. (n.d.-i). Quick Answers: What are filtered and unfiltered resources in nursing? Links to an external site.Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicanswers.
waldenu.edu/faq/73299 - Document: Matrix Worksheet Template (Word Document)Download Document: Matrix Worksheet Template (Word Document)
Use this document to complete Part 1 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
Expert Answer and Explanation
| Full citation of selected article | Article #1 | Article #2 | ||
| Berge, J., Hjelmesaeth, J., Hertel, J. K., Gjevestad, E., Småstuen, M. C., Johnson, L. K., Martins, C., Andersen, E., Helgerud, J., & Støren, Ø. (2021). Effect of aerobic exercise intensity on energy expenditure and weight loss in severe obesity-a randomized controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 29(2), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23078 | Fu, C.-P., Oczypok, E. E., Ali, H., DeLany, J. P., Reeves, V. L., Chang, R.-F., & Kershaw, E. E. (2022). Effect of physical activity in a weight loss program on circulating total A NGPTL8 concentrations in northern Americans with obesity: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 32(7), 1725–1733. https://doi-org.su.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2022.04.006 | |||
| Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) | I selected this article for two main reasons. One of the reasons is that the article is an original study, and this conforms with the instructions of the assignment. Second, I have selected the article because it studies the clinical issue of interest. The study investigates the impact of a 24-week program that includes either moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) or a combination of MICT with high-intensity interval training (HIIT/MICT) on body weight reduction in individuals with obesity. | This article was chosen because of its examination of the correlation between physical activity and weight loss. Weight reduction is a method to enhance the well-being of those suffering from obesity. The ethical aspect of research in this study, as it pertains to the clinical issue of interest, revolves around the concept of informed consent. Prior to including them in the study, the researchers obtained informed consent from the participants. | ||
| Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article | The objective of this study was to assess and contrast the impact of two distinct aerobic exercise regimens with varying levels of intensity on energy expenditure. | This study aimed to investigate two main objectives: 1) to determine the impact of weight loss by lifestyle intervention on the levels of circulating total angiopoietin-like protein 8 (ANGPTL8), and 2) to examine the influence of physical activity on serum total ANGPTL8 in individuals from northern America who have obesity but do not have diabetes. | ||
| Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. | The methodology used to conduct the study is a single‐center randomized controlled trial. This methodology is a quantitative research design. | The research was carried out via a prospective randomized controlled experiment. This approach is a quantitative method. | ||
| A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. | The methodology’s strength is in its ability to facilitate a comparison between a 24-week MICT program and a combined MICT with HIIT/MICT program in terms of their effectiveness in lowering body weight among individuals with obesity. The authors used intention-to-treat analyses (mixed models) to identify reliability and validity of the methodology and found it to be reliable and valid. | An advantage of the methodology employed is its ability to quantify the efficacy of ANGPTL8 in addressing obesity. The technique also mitigated bias in the investigation. The approach was deemed valid as it facilitated laboratory inquiry into the causal association between physical exercise and obesity. The study is also valid because its findings are consistent with those other peer-reviewed studies indicated by the authors in the findings section. | ||
| General Notes/Comments | The study is crucial as it will enable me to advocate for physical activity as a strategy for addressing obesity in adults. In other words, it will help in proving that physical activity is an effective intervention for reducing excess weight in people with obesity. | This study’s findings can also be used to show that physical activity is a best practice that can be used to improve physical health of people with obesity. |
| Article #3 | Article #4 |
| Mason, C., de Dieu Tapsoba, J., Duggan, C., Wang, C. Y., Alfano, C. M., & McTiernan, A. (2019). Eating behaviors and weight loss outcomes in a 12-month randomized trial of diet and/or exercise intervention in postmenopausal women. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16, 1-11. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-019-0887-1 | Mora-Gonzalez, J., Esteban-Cornejo, I., Cadenas-Sanchez, C., Migueles, J. H., Molina-Garcia, P., Rodriguez-Ayllon, M., Henriksson, P., Pontifex, M. B., Catena, A., & Ortega, F. B. (2019). Physical fitness, physical activity, and executive function in children with overweight and obesity. The Journal of Pediatrics, 208, 50–56. https://doi-org.su.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.028 |
| This article has been chosen because it examines the influence of physical activity on weight reduction. The ethical principle behind the research in this study is fairness. The project aims to enhance justice by providing medical care to those suffering from obesity. | I have chosen this article because of its examination of the causal association between physical activity and childhood obesity. I have selected it because the article demonstrates the correlation between the two variables under study. It also shows interest in pediatrics and their health and can be improved by managing obesity among this group. |
| The objective of the study was to investigate the impact of initial eating habits on adherence to the intervention and weight outcomes in postmenopausal women who are overweight or obese. Additionally, the study aimed to evaluate the impacts of the intervention on eating behaviors. | To investigate the correlations between physical fitness, physical activity, and executive function in children who are overweight or obese. |
| The methodology used in conducting the study was a randomized controlled trial, which is a quantitative research design. It included 439 women with BMI of BMI ≥25 kg/m2. | The research methodology employed in this study is a quantitative, cross-sectional approach. |
| The method’s strength is that it is the only form of investigation capable of establishing causation by comparing effects of treatment methods or interventions between two groups. RCT is a reliable and valid method of study and is known to provide good results. | Cross-sectional studies are advantageous due to their efficiency and cost-effectiveness. They are the most effective method for determining the prevalence and investigating the relationships between various exposures and outcomes. Cross-sectional studies are the optimal method for determining the prevalence of a condition and are valuable for detecting relationships, which may subsequently be further investigated using a cohort study or a randomized controlled research. The primary challenge associated with this particular sort of study lies in distinguishing between causation and mere correlation. |
| This study determined that exercise alone does not have a significant effect on weight reduction in women. Combining exercise with a nutritious diet yields a greater effect in achieving weight loss. It confirms that apart from exercise, people with obesity, especially women, should maintain a healthy diet. Nurses can use the study’s findings to support diet and exercise as interventions for obesity management. | This study is significant because it provides data regarding management of obesity in children. |
References
Berge, J., Hjelmesaeth, J., Hertel, J. K., Gjevestad, E., Småstuen, M. C., Johnson, L. K., Martins, C., Andersen, E., Helgerud, J., & Støren, Ø. (2021). Effect of aerobic exercise intensity on energy expenditure and weight loss in severe obesity-a randomized controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 29(2), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23078
Fu, C.-P., Oczypok, E. E., Ali, H., DeLany, J. P., Reeves, V. L., Chang, R.-F., & Kershaw, E. E. (2022). Effect of physical activity in a weight loss program on circulating total A NGPTL8 concentrations in northern Americans with obesity: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 32(7), 1725–1733. https://doi-org.su.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2022.04.006
Mason, C., de Dieu Tapsoba, J., Duggan, C., Wang, C. Y., Alfano, C. M., & McTiernan, A. (2019). Eating behaviors and weight loss outcomes in a 12-month randomized trial of diet and/or exercise intervention in postmenopausal women. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16, 1-11. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-019-0887-1
Mora-Gonzalez, J., Esteban-Cornejo, I., Cadenas-Sanchez, C., Migueles, J. H., Molina-Garcia, P., Rodriguez-Ayllon, M., Henriksson, P., Pontifex, M. B., Catena, A., & Ortega, F. B. (2019). Physical fitness, physical activity, and the executive function in children with overweight and obesity. The Journal of Pediatrics, 208, 50–56. https://doi-org.su.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.028
Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers.
Limited Offer: Get 30% OFF Your First Order
Rubric
URS_6052_Module02_Week03_
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies After reading each of the four peer–reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following: *The full citation of each peer–reviewed article in APA format *A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer–reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. *A brief description of the aims of the research of each article *A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed methods approach.
|
|
90 pts
|
||||
|
Resource Synthesis
|
|
5 pts
|
||||
|
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
|
|
5 pts
|
||||
|
Total Points: 100
|
||||||
