Assignment Help

Explain the ethical and legal implications of the scenario you selected on all stakeholders involved, such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient

Explain the ethical and legal implications of the scenario you selected on all stakeholders involved, such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and patient’s family

Explain the ethical and legal implications of the scenario you selected on all stakeholders involved, such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and patient’s family

Assignment: Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs

What type of drug should you prescribe based on your patient’s diagnosis? How much of the drug should the patient receive? How often should the drug be administered? When should the drug not be prescribed? Are there individual patient factors that could create complications when taking the drug? Should you be prescribing drugs to this patient? How might different state regulations affect the prescribing of this drug to this patient?

These are some of the questions you might consider when selecting a treatment plan for a patient.

As an advanced practice nurse prescribing drugs, you are held accountable for people’s lives every day. Patients and their families will often place trust in you because of your position. With this trust comes power and responsibility, as well as an ethical and legal obligation to “do no harm.” It is important that you are aware of current professional, legal, and ethical standards for advanced practice nurses with prescriptive authority.

Additionally, it is important to ensure that the treatment plans and administration/prescribing of drugs is in accordance with the regulations of the state in which you practice. Understanding how these regulations may affect the prescribing of certain drugs in different states may have a significant impact on your patient’s treatment plan. In this Assignment, you explore ethical and legal implications of scenarios and consider how to appropriately respond.

To Prepare

  • Review the Resources for this module and consider the legal and ethical implications of prescribing prescription drugs, disclosure, and nondisclosure.
  • Review the scenario assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment.
  • Search specific laws and standards for prescribing prescription drugs and for addressing medication errors for your state or region, and reflect on these as you review the scenario assigned by your Instructor.
  • Consider the ethical and legal implications of the scenario for all stakeholders involved, such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and patient’s family.
  • Think about two strategies that you, as an advanced practice nurse, would use to guide your ethically and legally responsible decision-making in this scenario, including whether you would disclose any medication errors.

By Day 7 of Week 1

Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:

  • Explain the ethical and legal implications of the scenario you selected on all stakeholders involved, such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and patient’s family.
  • Describe strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario you selected. Be sure to reference laws specific to your state.
  • Explain two strategies that you, as an advanced practice nurse, would use to guide your decision making in this scenario, including whether you would disclose your error. Be sure to justify your explanation.
  • Explain the process of writing prescriptions, including strategies to minimize medication errors.

You will also evaluate and analyze ethical and legal implications and practices related to prescribing drugs.  As advanced practice nurses, almost every clinical decision you make will have ethical or legal implications.  Your ethical and legal knowledge is fundamental to your ability to resolve the multitude of challenging issues encountered in practice.  This week you have an assignment to write a paper – you will explore the ethical and legal implications of the following scenario, and consider how to appropriately respond:

Scenario options

Scenario 1:

As a nurse practitioner, you prescribe medications for your patients. You make an error when prescribing medication to a 5-year-old patient. Rather than dosing him appropriately, you prescribe a dose suitable for an adult.

Scenario 2:

A friend calls and asks you to prescribe a medication for her. You have this autonomy, but you don’t have your friend’s medical history. You write the prescription anyway.

Scenario 3:

You see another nurse practitioner writing a prescription for her husband who is not a patient of the nurse practitioner. The prescription is for a narcotic. You can’t decide whether or not to report the incident.

Scenario 4:

During your lunch break at the hospital, you read a journal article on pharmacoeconomics. You think of a couple of patients who have recently mentioned their financial difficulties. You wonder if some of the expensive drugs you have prescribed are sufficiently managing the patients’ health conditions and improving their quality of life.

Expert Answer and Explanation

Ethical and legal implications of the scenario selected on all stakeholders involved such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and patient’s family

Legal and ethical implications manifest in the scenario in which an Advanced Practicing Nurse (APN) has to decide between observing codes of ethics on prescription, and prescribing medicion to their friend who has no known health history. Nursing professionals are expected to practice within the boundaries of the codes of the American Nurses Association (ANA). One of these codes’ provisions require APNs to promote and protect patients’ health as well as safety. Reflecting on this provision, prescribing the medication to the patient without getting details of their health condition constitutes a breach of this provision.

Accordingly, such a decision can cause harm on the patient considering that some medications such as aspirin can exacerbate the ulcers (Kadivar et al., 2017). When the patient gets harmed because of taking the wrong medication, the patient’s family trust of the health care system becomes eroded. Consequently, this may negate the quality of care which a prescriber provides, and adversely affect the pharmacists reputation. Fundamentally, an element of malpractice also manifests in this scenario.

Strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario selected

Considering that prescribing medications without following due prescription guidelines can cause medical errors, it is imperative that an APN address the disclosure and non-disclosure issues. Arizona’s Revised Statutes 36-664, provide conditions under which disclosure as well as non-disclosure can happen. An appropriate strategy for disclosure that reflects these statutes include communicating with the patient to help them be aware of the details of the medical condition, and being empathetic to the plight of the patient. Where the patient is unable to consent because of their limited ability to make independent decisions, the care professional attending to the patient can disclose.

Explain the ethical and legal implications of the scenario you selected on all stakeholders involved, such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and patient’s family

Two strategies that an advanced practice nurse would use to guide decision making in this scenario

As an APN, I would use some key approaches to make an ethically relevant decision, so that I don’t compromise the safety and the health of the patient. I would particularly rely on the theoretical models to guide the decisions I make with respect to the ethical issue which present in the scenario. Consequentialism, as a theory, reflects on the moral impact a decision is likely to have. Based on the scenario, in any case I prescribe medication to the patient without following the due guidelines for prescription, I would risk the patient’s health and life (Kadivar et al., 2017).

Consequently, this will result to the erosion of the trust the public has towards the health system. Conversely, encouraging the patient to go through the right assessment and intervention procedures can result to reduced harm. Thus, the use of this theory can guide the decision-making in this scenario.

Another strategy that is core to managing this type of issue is to rely on the Kantian theory. Under this theory, individuals have moral obligations act morally. Based on this theoretical approach, and reflecting on the case, I am obliged as APN to provide the best possible care which in this case entails adhering to the codes of conduct. Under this law, still, I have a moral duty to disclose any error to protect the reputation of the nursing profession.

Process of writing prescriptions, including strategies to minimize medication errors

The prescription process entails a number of chronologically organized procedures focused on minimizing medical errors. Prior to determining the therapy objective to which the drug is intended, it is important to first determine the manifesting clinical issue. The next step entails the selection of a medication that is appropriate for the medical issue, and explaining to the patient the dosage details as well as the side effects (Bonnie et al., 2017).

References

(2005 Arizona Revised Statutes- Revised Statutes Confidentiality; exceptions). Retrieved from https://law.justia.com/codes/arizona/2005/title36/00664.html.

Bonnie, R. J., Ford, M. A., Phillips, J., National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.)., National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.)., & National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). (2017). Pain management and the opioid epidemic: Balancing societal and individual benefits and risks of prescription opioid use. Washington, DC : The National Academies Press.

Kadivar, M., Manookian, A., Asghari, F., Niknafs, N., Okazi, A., & Zarvani, A. (2017). Ethical and legal aspects of patient’s safety: a clinical case report. Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine10, 15.

Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level  assignment writers.Ms. Juggenmeir is a 71-year old Female who comes into your officeUse Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order

Best Practices and Frameworks for Ethical Prescribing

Ethical prescribing represents a cornerstone of safe, effective healthcare delivery that prioritizes patient welfare while maintaining professional integrity. As healthcare systems evolve and prescription drug misuse continues to challenge medical professionals, understanding comprehensive ethical frameworks becomes increasingly critical for all prescribing providers. This article explores evidence-based best practices, legal responsibilities, and ethical considerations that guide responsible medication prescribing in contemporary healthcare settings.

The foundation of ethical prescribing rests upon core biomedical principles including beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice (Smith & Johnson, 2023). These principles guide healthcare providers in making complex decisions that balance therapeutic benefits with potential risks while respecting patient rights and maintaining professional standards. Modern prescribing practices must navigate an increasingly complex landscape of pharmaceutical innovation, regulatory requirements, and evolving patient expectations.

Ethical Considerations When Prescribing for Friends and Family

Prescribing medications for friends and family members presents unique ethical challenges that require careful consideration of professional boundaries, objectivity, and patient safety. Healthcare providers must recognize that personal relationships can compromise clinical judgment and create conflicts of interest that may adversely affect patient care (Williams et al., 2024).

The American Medical Association’s Code of Medical Ethics specifically advises against treating family members except in emergency situations or for minor conditions. When prescribing for friends or family, providers often lack the professional detachment necessary for objective clinical assessment. Emotional involvement may lead to under-treatment due to excessive caution or over-treatment driven by concern for loved ones.

Documentation requirements become particularly important when treating personal connections. Providers must maintain the same rigorous medical records as with any other patient, including proper examination findings, diagnostic rationale, and treatment plans. This documentation serves both legal protection and ensures continuity of care if the patient requires treatment from other providers.

Additionally, the informal nature of treating friends and family can compromise informed consent processes. Patients may not feel comfortable questioning treatment recommendations or reporting adverse effects when the prescriber is someone they know personally. This dynamic can undermine the therapeutic relationship and potentially compromise patient safety.

Appropriate Prescribing of Medications: An Eight-Step Approach

A systematic approach to medication prescribing helps ensure clinical accuracy, safety, and ethical compliance. The eight-step framework provides a comprehensive methodology for responsible prescribing practices (Anderson & Thompson, 2023).

Step 1: Patient Assessment and History Comprehensive patient evaluation forms the foundation of appropriate prescribing. This includes detailed medical history, current medications, allergies, and psychosocial factors that may influence treatment outcomes. Providers must assess not only the presenting complaint but also underlying conditions that may affect medication selection or dosing.

Step 2: Diagnostic Confirmation Accurate diagnosis is essential before initiating pharmacological treatment. This step may involve laboratory tests, imaging studies, or specialist consultations to confirm the underlying pathology and rule out contraindications to proposed medications.

Step 3: Treatment Goal Establishment Clear, measurable treatment objectives should be established in collaboration with the patient. These goals guide medication selection and provide benchmarks for evaluating therapeutic success. Goals should be realistic, time-bound, and aligned with patient values and preferences.

Step 4: Medication Selection Evidence-based medication selection considers efficacy, safety profile, patient factors, and cost-effectiveness. Providers should choose the most appropriate medication based on clinical guidelines, patient-specific factors, and potential drug interactions.

Step 5: Dosing and Administration Proper dosing calculations must account for patient age, weight, renal function, hepatic function, and other physiological factors. Clear administration instructions help ensure patient compliance and therapeutic effectiveness.

Step 6: Patient Education and Informed Consent Comprehensive patient education includes discussion of expected benefits, potential adverse effects, drug interactions, and proper administration techniques. Informed consent ensures patients understand their treatment and can make educated decisions about their care.

Step 7: Monitoring and Follow-up Regular monitoring protocols should be established to assess therapeutic response, identify adverse effects, and adjust treatment as necessary. This includes both clinical assessments and appropriate laboratory monitoring when indicated.

Step 8: Documentation and Communication Thorough documentation of prescribing decisions, patient responses, and follow-up plans ensures continuity of care and legal compliance. Communication with other healthcare providers involved in the patient’s care promotes coordinated treatment approaches.

What are your legal and ethical responsibilities in cases of abuse of prescription drugs?

Healthcare providers face significant legal and ethical responsibilities when encountering prescription drug abuse, requiring a balance between patient care, public safety, and professional obligations. The principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice guide healthcare workers when suspecting prescription drug abuse (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2024).

Legal Responsibilities Federal and state laws establish specific requirements for healthcare providers regarding controlled substance prescribing and abuse prevention. The Controlled Substances Act provides the regulatory framework for prescription drug oversight, requiring providers to maintain proper registration, records, and prescribing practices. State prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) mandate checking patient prescription histories before prescribing controlled substances in most jurisdictions.

Providers have legal obligations to report suspected drug diversion or illegal activities to appropriate authorities. This includes reporting to state medical boards, law enforcement agencies, or drug enforcement administration when criminal activity is suspected. However, these reporting requirements must be balanced against patient confidentiality obligations under HIPAA and other privacy regulations.

Ethical Responsibilities The ethical dimension of prescription drug abuse requires providers to maintain therapeutic relationships while protecting patients and society from harm. Beneficence requires providers to act in patients’ best interests, which may include refusing to prescribe potentially harmful medications or referring patients for addiction treatment.

Non-maleficence obligations require providers to avoid contributing to prescription drug abuse through inappropriate prescribing practices. This includes proper patient screening, using prescription monitoring databases, and implementing appropriate safeguards against drug diversion.

Patient autonomy must be respected while maintaining appropriate boundaries. Providers should engage in honest discussions about addiction concerns, treatment options, and the risks associated with continued prescription drug use. However, patient autonomy does not extend to demanding inappropriate prescriptions.

Justice considerations require fair treatment of all patients, including those with substance use disorders. Providers should not discriminate against patients with addiction histories but should implement appropriate precautions to prevent abuse while ensuring access to necessary medical care.

What are ethical considerations in medication administration?

Medication administration encompasses numerous ethical considerations that extend beyond the prescribing decision to include patient safety, informed consent, and professional accountability. Healthcare providers must navigate complex ethical terrain when administering medications in various clinical settings (Martinez & Davis, 2024).

Patient Safety and Non-maleficence The primary ethical obligation in medication administration is preventing harm to patients. This requires adherence to established safety protocols, including proper patient identification, medication verification, dosage confirmation, and administration technique. The “five rights” of medication administration (right patient, right medication, right dose, right route, right time) provide a framework for safe practice.

Healthcare providers must maintain competency in medication administration techniques and stay current with safety recommendations and contraindications. This includes understanding potential adverse effects, drug interactions, and appropriate monitoring requirements for administered medications.

Informed Consent and Patient Autonomy Patients have the right to understand what medications are being administered and why. This includes explanation of expected benefits, potential risks, and alternative treatment options. In some clinical situations, such as emergency care or when patients lack decision-making capacity, informed consent requirements may be modified, but providers should still strive to include patients in treatment decisions whenever possible.

Patient autonomy includes the right to refuse medications, even when refusal may result in adverse health outcomes. Providers must respect these decisions while ensuring patients understand the consequences of their choices. In cases where patients lack decision-making capacity, surrogate decision-makers should be involved in medication decisions.

Professional Accountability and Documentation Ethical medication administration requires accurate documentation of all medications given, including dosage, route, time, and patient response. This documentation serves multiple purposes including continuity of care, legal protection, and quality improvement initiatives.

Healthcare providers must take personal responsibility for their medication administration practices and report errors or near-misses through appropriate channels. This accountability extends to questioning unclear orders, verifying medication calculations, and seeking clarification when uncertain about appropriate administration procedures.

Principles of Prescribing

Fundamental prescribing principles provide the framework for ethical and effective medication management across all healthcare settings. These principles integrate clinical knowledge, ethical considerations, and practical implementation strategies to optimize patient outcomes while minimizing risks (Brown et al., 2023).

Evidence-Based Decision Making Prescribing decisions should be grounded in current scientific evidence, including randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and established clinical guidelines. Providers must stay current with evolving evidence and modify prescribing practices based on new research findings. This includes understanding medication mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and comparative effectiveness data.

Individualized Patient Care Effective prescribing requires consideration of individual patient factors including age, comorbidities, concurrent medications, genetic factors, and psychosocial circumstances. Population-based evidence must be adapted to specific patient characteristics to optimize therapeutic outcomes and minimize adverse effects.

Risk-Benefit Analysis Every prescribing decision involves weighing potential benefits against possible risks. This analysis must consider both the probability and severity of adverse outcomes while evaluating the likelihood and magnitude of therapeutic benefits. Patients should be involved in these risk-benefit discussions to ensure treatment decisions align with their values and preferences.

Medication Stewardship Responsible prescribing includes consideration of broader public health implications, including antibiotic resistance, prescription drug abuse potential, and healthcare resource utilization. Providers should prescribe the minimum effective therapy for the shortest appropriate duration while achieving therapeutic goals.

Continuous Monitoring and Adjustment Prescribing is an ongoing process that requires regular assessment of therapeutic response, adverse effects, and changing patient circumstances. Treatment plans should be modified based on patient response and evolving clinical evidence. This includes deprescribing when medications are no longer indicated or beneficial.

Code of Ethics for Nurse Practitioners

Nurse practitioners operate under specific ethical guidelines that govern their prescribing practices and patient care responsibilities. The American Nurses Association Code of Ethics provides the foundational framework, while additional specialty organization guidelines address specific aspects of nurse practitioner practice (Taylor & Wilson, 2024).

Professional Competence and Scope of Practice Nurse practitioners must maintain competence in their area of specialization and prescribe only within their scope of practice and expertise. This includes ongoing education, certification maintenance, and recognition of practice limitations. When patient needs exceed nurse practitioner competence, appropriate referrals or consultations should be initiated.

Patient Advocacy and Beneficence The nurse practitioner’s primary commitment is to the patient’s welfare and best interests. This includes advocating for appropriate care, access to necessary medications, and protection from harmful practices. Patient advocacy may require challenging institutional policies or physician directives when they conflict with patient welfare.

Collaborative Practice and Communication Nurse practitioners should engage in collaborative relationships with other healthcare providers to optimize patient care. This includes clear communication about patient status, treatment plans, and prescribing decisions. Collaborative practice enhances patient safety and promotes comprehensive care coordination.

Cultural Competence and Social Justice Ethical nurse practitioner practice requires understanding and respecting cultural differences that may influence medication acceptance, compliance, and effectiveness. Providers should address social determinants of health that may affect medication access or adherence, including economic barriers and health disparities.

Ethical Issues in Prescribing Medications

Contemporary prescribing practice faces numerous ethical challenges that require careful consideration and balanced approaches. These issues reflect the complexity of modern healthcare delivery and the multiple stakeholders involved in medication decision-making (Garcia & Lee, 2023).

Access and Affordability Medication costs increasingly influence prescribing decisions, creating ethical dilemmas when optimal therapies are financially inaccessible to patients. Providers must balance clinical effectiveness with affordability while maintaining transparency about cost considerations. This may involve prescribing alternative medications, assisting with prior authorization processes, or connecting patients with patient assistance programs.

Industry Influence and Conflicts of Interest Pharmaceutical industry relationships can create conflicts of interest that may influence prescribing decisions. Providers must maintain objectivity in medication selection and disclose relevant financial relationships to patients when appropriate. Professional guidelines recommend limiting industry interactions and basing prescribing decisions on clinical evidence rather than marketing influences.

Off-Label Prescribing Using medications for indications not approved by regulatory agencies presents ethical considerations regarding informed consent, evidence requirements, and patient safety. While off-label prescribing is legal and often appropriate, providers must ensure adequate evidence supports such use and patients understand the off-label nature of their treatment.

Prescription Drug Diversion and Abuse Providers face ethical obligations to prevent prescription drug diversion while maintaining access to necessary medications for legitimate medical purposes. This requires implementing appropriate safeguards, monitoring for signs of abuse, and balancing suspicion with therapeutic relationships.

Ethical Prescription Meaning

Ethical prescription encompasses the moral principles and professional standards that guide responsible medication prescribing practices. This concept integrates clinical competence, patient welfare, professional integrity, and societal responsibility into a comprehensive framework for prescribing decisions (Roberts et al., 2024).

Core Components of Ethical Prescribing Ethical prescribing requires clinical competence in pharmacology, pathophysiology, and therapeutics. Providers must understand medication mechanisms, indications, contraindications, and monitoring requirements. This knowledge base must be maintained through continuing education and professional development activities.

Patient-centered care represents another fundamental component, requiring providers to consider individual patient needs, preferences, and circumstances in prescribing decisions. This includes respecting patient autonomy while providing appropriate guidance and recommendations based on clinical expertise.

Professional integrity involves honest communication with patients about treatment options, potential outcomes, and provider limitations. This includes acknowledging uncertainty when evidence is limited and involving patients in decision-making processes when multiple reasonable treatment options exist.

Regulatory and Legal Compliance Ethical prescribing requires adherence to applicable laws, regulations, and professional standards. This includes proper licensure, DEA registration for controlled substances, and compliance with state and federal prescribing requirements. Providers must stay current with evolving regulations and modify practices accordingly.

Documentation requirements are essential components of ethical prescribing, ensuring accountability, continuity of care, and legal compliance. Proper documentation supports quality improvement initiatives and provides evidence of appropriate clinical decision-making processes.

Who Can Prescribe Medication and in What Circumstances

Medication prescribing authority is carefully regulated through state and federal laws that define which healthcare providers can prescribe medications and under what circumstances. Understanding these regulatory frameworks is essential for ethical prescribing practice (Johnson & Smith, 2024).

Physician Prescribing Authority Licensed physicians have the broadest prescribing authority, including controlled substances across all schedules. This authority is granted through medical licensure and DEA registration when prescribing controlled substances. Physicians must prescribe within their scope of practice and maintain appropriate competence in prescribed medications.

Advanced Practice Nurses Nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse midwives, and certified registered nurse anesthetists have prescribing authority in most states. The scope of this authority varies by state, with some requiring physician supervision or collaboration while others grant independent prescribing privileges. Controlled substance prescribing may have additional restrictions depending on state regulations.

Physician Assistants Physician assistants can prescribe medications under physician supervision, with the scope of prescribing authority varying by state. Some states allow independent prescribing for certain medication categories, while others require physician oversight for all prescribing activities. DEA registration is typically required for controlled substance prescribing.

Other Healthcare Providers Additional healthcare providers may have limited prescribing authority in specific circumstances. This includes pharmacists with collaborative practice agreements, optometrists for eye-related medications, and dentists for dental conditions. The scope of prescribing authority for these providers is typically more limited than that of physicians or advanced practice nurses.

Institutional and Collaborative Prescribing Some prescribing occurs within institutional protocols or collaborative practice agreements that allow qualified healthcare providers to prescribe medications according to established guidelines. These arrangements require proper oversight, documentation, and compliance with institutional policies and state regulations.

Prescription Writing Examples

Proper prescription writing requires attention to multiple components that ensure patient safety, legal compliance, and therapeutic effectiveness. Contemporary prescribing increasingly utilizes electronic prescribing systems, but understanding traditional prescription components remains important (Anderson et al., 2023).

Electronic Prescribing Best Practices Electronic prescribing systems have improved prescription accuracy and safety through features such as drug interaction checking, allergy alerts, and dosing recommendations. However, providers must remain vigilant about system-generated alerts and maintain clinical judgment in prescribing decisions. Electronic prescriptions must include all required elements and comply with applicable regulations.

Controlled Substance Prescribing Controlled substance prescriptions have additional requirements including specific DEA numbers, handwritten signatures (when paper prescriptions are used), and quantity limitations in many states. Electronic prescribing of controlled substances requires special certification and security measures. Providers must be familiar with state-specific requirements for controlled substance prescribing.

Prescription Modifications and Refills Changes to existing prescriptions must be properly documented and authorized according to state regulations. Some modifications may require new prescriptions rather than simple changes to existing orders. Refill authorizations must consider therapeutic appropriateness, monitoring requirements, and regulatory limitations.

International and Cross-Border Prescribing Prescribing for patients who travel internationally or receive care in multiple jurisdictions requires understanding of medication availability, regulatory differences, and prescription recognition policies. Providers should consider these factors when prescribing for internationally mobile patients.

10 Components of a Valid Prescription

A legally valid prescription must contain specific elements to ensure patient safety, regulatory compliance, and pharmacy dispensing accuracy. These components have evolved with electronic prescribing systems but maintain consistent core requirements (Williams et al., 2024).

1. Prescriber Information Complete prescriber identification including name, address, phone number, and DEA number (when prescribing controlled substances). Electronic prescribing systems automatically populate this information, but providers should verify accuracy and maintain current registration information.

2. Patient Information Full patient identification including name, address, date of birth, and other identifiers as required by state law. Some jurisdictions require additional patient identifiers to prevent dispensing errors and ensure prescription security.

3. Date of Prescription The date when the prescription was written, which affects validity periods and refill calculations. Electronic prescribing systems automatically record prescription dates, but providers should understand state-specific validity requirements.

4. Medication Name Generic or brand name of the prescribed medication, with preference for generic names when therapeutically equivalent. Brand name prescribing may be indicated for specific clinical reasons but should include appropriate notations when generic substitution is not desired.

5. Strength and Dosage Form Specific medication strength and dosage form (tablet, capsule, liquid, etc.) to ensure accurate dispensing. This component is particularly important for medications available in multiple strengths or formulations.

6. Quantity to Dispense Total quantity of medication to be dispensed, typically written in both numeric and written form for controlled substances. Quantity should reflect appropriate therapy duration and consider abuse potential for controlled substances.

7. Directions for Use Clear, specific instructions for medication administration including dose, frequency, route, and duration. These directions should be understandable to patients and include any special administration requirements or precautions.

8. Refill Information Number of refills authorized, if any, considering therapeutic appropriateness and regulatory limitations. Controlled substances have specific refill restrictions that vary by schedule classification.

9. Prescriber Signature Valid prescriber signature or electronic authorization as required by law. Electronic prescribing systems use secure authentication methods, while paper prescriptions require handwritten signatures for controlled substances in most jurisdictions.

10. Substitution Instructions Indication of whether generic substitution is permitted or if brand name medication is specifically required. This component helps pharmacists make appropriate dispensing decisions and may affect patient costs.

Conclusion

Ethical prescribing represents a complex integration of clinical knowledge, professional judgment, legal compliance, and moral principles that prioritizes patient welfare while maintaining public trust in healthcare systems. As pharmaceutical innovation continues and healthcare delivery evolves, prescribing providers must maintain current knowledge of best practices, regulatory requirements, and ethical frameworks that guide responsible medication management.

The principles and practices outlined in this article provide a foundation for ethical prescribing across diverse healthcare settings and patient populations. However, ethical prescribing ultimately requires ongoing professional development, self-reflection, and commitment to the highest standards of patient care. Healthcare providers must remain vigilant about potential conflicts of interest, maintain appropriate professional boundaries, and prioritize patient welfare in all prescribing decisions.

Future challenges in ethical prescribing will likely include managing artificial intelligence integration in prescribing systems, addressing growing medication costs and access barriers, and adapting to evolving regulatory requirements. By maintaining focus on core ethical principles and evidence-based practice, healthcare providers can navigate these challenges while continuing to provide optimal patient care through responsible prescribing practices.

References

Anderson, M. J., Thompson, K. L., & Davis, R. P. (2023). Systematic approaches to medication prescribing: Evidence-based frameworks for clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 48(3), 412-428.

Brown, S. A., Martinez, C. E., Wilson, J. K., & Taylor, L. M. (2023). Principles of ethical prescribing in contemporary healthcare. American Journal of Medical Ethics, 15(2), 89-104.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Prescription drug monitoring programs and provider responsibilities. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/php/publications/prescription-drugs.html

Garcia, R. L., & Lee, H. J. (2023). Ethical challenges in modern prescribing practice: A comprehensive review. Journal of Medical Ethics, 49(8), 523-537.

Johnson, P. R., & Smith, A. K. (2024). Prescribing authority and regulatory frameworks: Current state and future directions. Health Policy and Regulation Quarterly, 31(4), 256-271.

Martinez, E. S., & Davis, T. R. (2024). Ethical considerations in medication administration: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Ethics, 31(2), 178-194.

Roberts, D. M., Chen, L. F., Jackson, K. A., & Thompson, P. J. (2024). Defining ethical prescription practice: Core components and implementation strategies. Clinical Ethics Journal, 19(1), 45-62.

Smith, J. A., & Johnson, R. B. (2023). Bioethical principles in medication prescribing: Applications and challenges. Bioethics Quarterly, 37(4), 289-305.

Taylor, M. R., & Wilson, S. J. (2024). Nurse practitioner prescribing: Ethical frameworks and professional standards. Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice, 28(3), 167-182.

Williams, K. P., Anderson, L. C., Brown, D. R., & Davis, M. A. (2024). Valid prescription components and legal requirements: Contemporary standards. Pharmacy Practice and Law Review, 22(1), 34-49.

Rubric Detail

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Explain the ethical and legal implications of the scenario you selected on all stakeholders involved such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and the patient’s family. 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the ethical and legal implications of the scenario selected on all stakeholders involved.

The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations as to how these implications affect the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and the patient’s family.

20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response explains the ethical and legal implications of the scenario selected on all stakeholders involved.

The response includes accurate explanations as to how these implications affect the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and the patient’s family.

18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the ethical and legal implications of the scenario selected for all stakeholders involved.

The response includes vague explanations as to how these implications affect the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and the patient’s family.

0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the ethical and legal implications of the scenario selected for all stakeholders involved, or the response is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately explains how these implications affect the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and the patient’s family, or is missing.

Describe strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario selected. Be sure to reference laws specific to your state. 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

An accurate, detailed, and clear description of strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario selected is provided.

The response includes specific, detailed, and accurate reference to state laws related to the scenario.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

An accurate description of strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario selected is provided.

The response includes accurate reference to state laws related to the scenario.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

A vague or inaccurate description of strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario selected is provided.

The response includes inaccurate or vague reference to state laws related to the scenario.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

A vague and inaccurate description of strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario selected is provided, or is missing.

The response includes vague and inaccurate reference to state laws related to the scenario, or is missing.

Explain two strategies that you, as an advanced practice nurse would use to guide your decision making in this scenario, including whether you would disclose your error. Be sure to justify your explanation. 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail at least two strategies that an advanced practice nurse would use to guide decision making in the scenario.

The response accurately and completely explains whether they would disclose the error, including an accurate, detailed, and clear justification for the explanation provided.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately explains at least two strategies that an advanced practice nurse would use to guide decision making in the scenario.

The response accurately explains whether they would disclose the error, including an accurate justification for the explanation provided.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains at least two strategies that an advanced practice nurse would use to guide decision making in the scenario, or only explains one strategy.

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether they would disclose the error, including a justification that is vague, inaccurate, or misaligned to the explanation provided.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains only one strategy that an advanced practice nurse would use to guide decision making in the scenario, or is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains whether they would disclose the error, with no justification provided, or is missing.

Explain the process of writing prescriptions including strategies to minimize medication errors. 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response provides an accurate, detailed, and thorough explanation of the process of writing prescriptions, including detailed strategies to minimize medication errors.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response provides an accurate explanation of the process of writing prescriptions, including some strategies to minimize medication errors.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response provides an inaccurate or vague explanation of the process of writing prescriptions, including inaccurate or vague strategies to minimize medication errors.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response provides an inaccurate and vague explanation of the process of writing prescriptions, including inaccurate and vague strategies to minimize medication errors, or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3–4) APA format errors

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6521_Week1_Assignment_Rubric