Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve.

Question

Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives. Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy. To Prepare: Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources. Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you. Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described. The Assignment: (2–3 pages) Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following: Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes. How was the success of the program or policy measured? How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted? What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? What specific information on unintended consequences was identified? What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not? Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.

Dan Palmer · Accepted Answer

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Patient Self-Management Support Programs Description The program’s objective is to assess the significance of a four-component intervention meant to prevent falls-related injuries. Part of the intervention will involve the use of customized action plan which emphasizes empowering patients to understand how to manage falls. How was the success of the program or policy measured? To determine the program’s success, the researchers collected data on cases of falls recorded in hospitals, and data that patients and physicians provided. The data was specifically collected from patients who visited the emergency departments seeking treatment for the injuries sustained during falls. How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? To ensure that the program benefits as many people as possible, 5,757 individuals, considered to be at an increased risk of fall were targeted. Following the implementation of the program, hospitals recorded fewer cases of falls. Patients and health insurers spent less on injuries related to the falls (Glasgow, Lichtenstein, & Marcus, 2003). Therefore, the inference that one can make based on these results is that the program is provides an effective intervention for mitigating the costs. What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? Those involved in the implementation of the program used the LifePlans data to examine whether the program was effective in terms of contributing to the decline in cases of falls. What specific information on unintended consequences were identified? Because patients took arrhythmia and other medications that raised the patients’ risk of fall, the unintended consequences reported included bruises. What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. The healthcare professionals and the Medicare beneficiaries aged 75 years and above primarily participated in the program. Insurers equally took part in the program implementation. Because the program seeks to reduce the risk of falls among patients, the program benefitted patients more than any other group of stakeholders (Turner et al., 2022). Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? The program attained the objective for which it was intended. This is because after measuring the outcomes, those who implemented the program found that hospitals reported fewer incidences of falls. This is because the interventions proposed as part of the program were effective to cause the decline in rates of falls among patients who took Medicare. Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not? Considering that the program addresses the factors that contribute to falls, I would suggest that the program be adopted in my workplace. Using the program, it would be possible to use it to determine how effective a falls prevention system is (Shiramizu et al., 2016). Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation. Working within the capacity of a nurse advocate, I could participate in assessing the efficacy of the program by assessing patients as part of the process of collecting data (Williams & Anderson, 2018). During patient assessment, I would focus on the patients’ history of falls, recording this information so that it can help those who would evaluate the program’s effectiveness, evaluate its benefit. General Notes/Comments One of the things that one should keep in mind is that assessing how effective a program is, is important in the sense that it helps optimize the outcomes of interventions meant to minimize cases of falls. It is also worth noting that when gathering data, one should be consistent in terms of how they collect data (Milstead & Short, 2019). Consistency, in this case, means using the same data collection approach when gathering data prior to and after conducting the study. References Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transitionLinks to an external site.. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267. Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse's guide (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2016). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program to address health inequitiesLinks to an external site.. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4(5), 983–991. Turner, K., Staggs, V. S., Potter, C., Cramer, E., Shorr, R. I., & Mion, L. C. (2022). Fall Prevention Practices and Implementation Strategies: Examining Consistency Across Hospital Units. Journal of patient safety, 18(1), e236–e242. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000758. Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerationsLinks to an external site.. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 386–393.

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation	Patient Self-Management Support Programs
Description	The program’s objective is to assess the significance of a four-component intervention meant to prevent falls-related injuries. Part of the intervention will involve the use of customized action plan which emphasizes empowering patients to understand how to manage falls.
How was the success of the program or policy measured?	To determine the program’s success, the researchers collected data on cases of falls recorded in hospitals, and data that patients and physicians provided. The data was specifically collected from patients who visited the emergency departments seeking treatment for the injuries sustained during falls.
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?	To ensure that the program benefits as many people as possible, 5,757 individuals, considered to be at an increased risk of fall were targeted. Following the implementation of the program, hospitals recorded fewer cases of falls. Patients and health insurers spent less on injuries related to the falls (Glasgow, Lichtenstein, & Marcus, 2003). Therefore, the inference that one can make based on these results is that the program is provides an effective intervention for mitigating the costs.
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?	Those involved in the implementation of the program used the LifePlans data to examine whether the program was effective in terms of contributing to the decline in cases of falls.
What specific information on unintended consequences were identified?	Because patients took arrhythmia and other medications that raised the patients’ risk of fall, the unintended consequences reported included bruises.
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.	The healthcare professionals and the Medicare beneficiaries aged 75 years and above primarily participated in the program. Insurers equally took part in the program implementation. Because the program seeks to reduce the risk of falls among patients, the program benefitted patients more than any other group of stakeholders (Turner et al., 2022).
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?	The program attained the objective for which it was intended. This is because after measuring the outcomes, those who implemented the program found that hospitals reported fewer incidences of falls. This is because the interventions proposed as part of the program were effective to cause the decline in rates of falls among patients who took Medicare.
Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?	Considering that the program addresses the factors that contribute to falls, I would suggest that the program be adopted in my workplace. Using the program, it would be possible to use it to determine how effective a falls prevention system is (Shiramizu et al., 2016).
Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation.	Working within the capacity of a nurse advocate, I could participate in assessing the efficacy of the program by assessing patients as part of the process of collecting data (Williams & Anderson, 2018). During patient assessment, I would focus on the patients’ history of falls, recording this information so that it can help those who would evaluate the program’s effectiveness, evaluate its benefit.
General Notes/Comments	One of the things that one should keep in mind is that assessing how effective a program is, is important in the sense that it helps optimize the outcomes of interventions meant to minimize cases of falls. It is also worth noting that when gathering data, one should be consistent in terms of how they collect data (Milstead & Short, 2019). Consistency, in this case, means using the same data collection approach when gathering data prior to and after conducting the study.

Feature	Program Evaluation	Policy Evaluation
Purpose	Assesses the effectiveness of specific programs or projects.	Evaluates the overall impact and effectiveness of policies.
Focus	Focuses on individual programs or interventions.	Focuses on the broader implications and outcomes of policies.
Scope	Narrower, targeting specific goals and activities.	Broader, looking at systemic or long-term impacts.
Timing	Conducted during or after the implementation of a program.	Often conducted after the policy has been enacted and applied.
Stakeholders	Program managers, participants, and staff.	Policymakers, government agencies, and the public.
Data Type	Often includes performance data and participant outcomes.	Involves broader social, economic, or health outcomes.

Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve

Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs

Expert Answer and Explanation

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis

FAQs:

What is the purpose of policy evaluation?

Healthcare program or policy evaluation examples

What is the difference between program evaluation and policy evaluation?

What are the 4 types of policy evaluation?

The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate and synthesize patient data to propose interventions for an individualized plan of care prioritizing health problems and health concerns

Mrs R is a 68-year-old married woman who has a history of hypertension, chronic heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite requiring 2L of oxygen/nasal cannula at home during activity, she continues to smoke two packs of cigarettes a day and has done so for 40 years

The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate personal and professional accountability in the context of social media.

A 75-year-old woman develops symptoms of a cold and buys an over-the-counter cold medication at the grocery store. The medication contains diphenhydramine, acetaminophen, and phenylephrine

For each of the nine NONPF competencies, write one paragraph explaining how the program has prepared you to meet the competency (for a total of at least nine paragraphs) – Fast, Quality and Affordable Assignment Expert

Write a 750-1000-word description of your proposed capstone project topic. Include the following

Select an issue from the following list: workplace violence, workplace injury, unit restructuring, floating, nurse turnover, nurse staffing ratios, or use of contract employees

Explore the link to the YRBS results provided in the topic Resources. After reviewing the data for your state, and based on the first letter of your first name, identify one trend and area of focus that is impacting teens:

Reread Take a Closer Look Exploring Claude Debussy’s “Clair de Lune” in your textbook

In a paper of 1,250-1,500 words, select 4 of the 6 articles you evaluated that demonstrate clear support for your evidence-based practice and complete the following for each article

Based on the case and other topic Resources, in 300-400 words, how might the individual(s) interpret their suffering in light of the Christian view of the fallen world and the hope of resurrection?

Reflect on the demographics of the area in which you live and cultures that are represented. In this assignment provide a 3-4-page APA formatted paper discussing the demographics of the area in which you live

COMPANY

LEGAL

FOLLOW US ON