Write a brief analysis no longer than 2 pages of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim
Write a brief analysis no longer than 2 pages of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim
Healthcare organizations continually seek to optimize healthcare performance. For years, this approach was a three-pronged one known as the Triple Aim, with efforts focused on improved population health, enhanced patient experience, and lower healthcare costs.
More recently, this approach has evolved to a Quadruple Aim by including a focus on improving the work life of healthcare providers. Each of these measures are impacted by decisions made at the organizational level, and organizations have increasingly turned to EBP to inform and justify these decisions.
To Prepare:
- Read the articles by Sikka, Morath, & Leape (2015); Crabtree, Brennan, Davis, & Coyle (2016); and Kim et al. (2016) provided in the Resources.
- Reflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.
- Consider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery.
To Complete:
Write a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim.
Your analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:
- Patient experience
- Population health
- Costs
- Work life of healthcare providers
Expert Answer and Explanation
Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is becoming popular among providers considering that it is associated with meaningful health outcomes. EBP is consistent with the four measures of the quadruple aim which focus on costs reduction, promotion of population health, improvement of patients’ experience, and maintaining work-life balance.
Connection with Patient Experience
The impact of the EBP is seen in patient experience where it ensures that providers make clinical intervention decisions, informed by the current evidence. EBP in particular focuses on meeting patients’ needs because it supports the delivery of targeted care that takes into account patients’ emotional, physiological and psychological needs. This translates to higher levels of patient satisfaction. EBP also contributes to this form of outcome by addressing the gap in access to quality care, ensuring that patients receive the same standard or quality of quality of clinical interventions (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023).
This lessens the risk of patient discontent which is common with the varying levels of care. Another aspect of the EBP is that it emphasizes engaging patients in making decisions, which are likely to conform to their likings.
Connection with Population Health
EBP intertwines with positive health outcomes considering that it involves the adoption of the best practices in health promotion. It specifically achieves this through research-based investigations that contribute to identifying the most effective interventions for certain clinical problems or illnesses. Through research, still, it is possible to establish the effectiveness of the existing interventions in terms of minimizing populations’ exposure to diseases (Engle et al., 2021).
This is noticeable in a scenario in which researchers conduct trials to determine the potency of a new vaccine in terms of reducing deaths and the rate of the spread of an infectious disease. In this case, the evidence generated through research informs the development of public health interventions, which public health personnel or epidemiologists deploy to cushion populations against the disease.
Connection with Costs
Prolonged duration of hospitalization and higher rates of re-hospitalization, which are associated with low quality care, contribute to driving up the costs of health services. This implies that the implementation of the EBP, which translates to improved care, results to the reduction in the expenses on treatment of health conditions. In healthcare settings, unplanned spending on unnecessary clinical interventions is one of the factors that cause the spike in costs and excessive use of medical resources and supplies.
Because the EBP emphasizes the use of treatments that have been demonstrated through research to work and improve patient care outcomes, it minimizes costs linked to unnecessary procedures or treatments (Lehman, Siegel, & Chiang, 2023). Furthermore, EBP can be useful in informing effective allocation of medical supplies, which ensures that the process of delivering care is sustainable.
Connection with Work-Life of Healthcare Providers
For providers, focusing on making decisions guided by evidence eases decision-making, reducing the stress and burnout linked to the cognitive overload. Emotional and physical exhaustion is a primary work-based challenge that affects providers’ social life. The lack of efficiency in the administration of clinical interventions coupled with the difficulty making decisions exacerbate this burnout, compromising providers’ work-life balance (Cardoso et al., 2021). With the EBP enhancing decision-making and contributing to the reduction of the burnout linked to cognitive overload, providers are able to attain the required work-life balance.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the EBP aligns with the quadruple aim in the sense that its implementation translates to maximizing the utilization of resources, and improving population health outcomes because it helps with identifying the effective interventions for disease promotion and prevention. Therefore, encouraging EBP is crucial if providers want to meet the quadruple aim.
References
Cardoso, D., Couto, F., Cardoso, A. F., Bobrowicz-Campos, E., Santos, L., Rodrigues, R., Coutinho, V., Pinto, D., Ramis, M. A., Rodrigues, M. A., & Apóstolo, J. (2021). The Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Educational Program on Undergraduate Nursing Students’ EBP Knowledge and Skills: A Cluster Randomized Control Trial. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(1), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010293.
Engle, R. L., Mohr, D. C., Holmes, S. K., Seibert, M. N., Afable, M., Leyson, J., & Meterko, M. (2021). Evidence-based practice and patient-centered care: Doing both well. Health care management review, 46(3), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000254.
Lehman, V. E. R., Siegel, J. E., & Chiang, E. N. (2023). The Price of Practice Change: Assessing the Cost of Integrating Research Findings Into Clinical Practice. Medical care, 61(10), 675–680. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001873.
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers.Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order
Weekly Resources
- Schmidt, N. A. & Brown, J. M. (2025). Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning
- Chapter 1, “What is Evidence-based practice?” (pp 3-31)
- Chapter 1 will help students understand the importance of EBP, the research process, barriers to the adoption of EBP and strategies to overcome them as well as strategies to transition evidence into nursing practice.
- Chapter 1, “What is Evidence-based practice?” (pp 3-31)
- Boller, J. (2017). Nurse educators: Leading health care to the quadruple aim sweet spot.Links to an external site. Journal of Nursing Education, 56 (12), 707–708. doi:10.3928/01484834-20171120-01
- Crabtree, E., Brennan, E., Davis, A., & Coyle, A. (2016). Improving patient care through nursing engagement in evidence-based practiceLinks to an external site.. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13 (2), 172–175. doi:10.1111/wvn.12126
- Kim, S. C., Stichler, J. F., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A.-M., & Davidson, J. E. (2016). Predictors of evidence-based practice implementation, job satisfaction, and group cohesion among regional fellowship program participantsLinks to an external site.. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13 (5), 340–348. doi:10.1111/wvn.12171
- Melnyk, B.M., Fineout-Overhold, E., Stillwell, S.B., & Williamson, K.M. (2010). Evidence-based practice step-by-step: The seven steps of evidence-based practiceLinks to an external site.. American Journal of Nursing, 110 (1), 51-53.
- Melnyk, B. M., Gallagher-Ford, L., Long, L. E., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2014). The establishment of evidence-based practice competencies for practicing registered nurses and advanced practice nurses in real-world clinical settings: Proficiencies to improve healthcare quality, reliability, patient outcomes, and costsLinks to an external site.. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11 (1), 5–15. doi:10.1111/wvn.12021
- Sikka, R., Morath, J. M., & Leape, L. (2015). The Quadruple Aim: Care, health, cost and meaning in workLinks to an external site.. BMJ Quality & Safety, 24 , 608–610. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004160
Walden University Library. (n.d.-a).Databases A-Z: NursingLinks to an external site.. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
Rubrics
NURS_6052_Module01_Week01_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_6052_Module01_Week01_Assignment_Rubric | ||
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite a brief analysis of the connection between evidence-based practice and the Quadruple Aim. Your analysis should address how evidence-based practice might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:· Patient experience· Population health· Costs· Work life of healthcare providers | 85 to >76.0 pts
Excellent The analysis clearly and accurately addresses in detail how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim. … The analysis accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the four measures of patient experience, population health, costs, and work-life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim. … The analysis provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim. The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the analysis provided with credible and detailed examples. 76 to >67.0 pts Good The analysis accurately addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim. … The analysis accurately explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim. … The analysis provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the analysis provided and may include some detailed examples. 67 to >59.0 pts Fair The analysis inaccurately or vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim. … The analysis inaccurately or vaguely explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim. … The analysis provides an inaccurate or vague analysis of the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague or inaccurate analysis of outside resources. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the analysis provided and may include vague or inaccurate examples. 59 to >0 pts Poor The analysis inaccurately and vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing. … The analysis inaccurately and vaguely explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing. … The analysis provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague and inaccurate analysis of outside resources. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the analysis provided or is missing. |
85 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 3 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) APA format errors. 3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) APA format errors. |
5 pts |
FAQs:
What is the quadruple aim in evidence-based practice?
The Quadruple Aim in evidence-based practice is a framework used to improve healthcare outcomes by focusing on four key goals:
-
Enhancing patient experience – Improving the quality, accessibility, and satisfaction of care.
-
Improving population health – Promoting better health outcomes across communities.
-
Reducing healthcare costs – Lowering unnecessary spending while maintaining quality.
-
Improving the work life of healthcare providers – Supporting staff well-being to reduce burnout and enhance performance.
Together, these aims guide healthcare organizations in delivering effective, efficient, and compassionate care.